- From: Dan Clark <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 2025 16:42:16 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1353/review/2819988873@github.com>
@dandclark commented on this pull request. > @@ -6057,6 +6058,7 @@ interface ShadowRoot : DocumentFragment { readonly attribute boolean clonable; readonly attribute boolean serializable; readonly attribute Element host; + attribute DOMString? referenceTarget; Sorry for the slow follow up here -- v2 is sketched out at https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/blob/gh-pages/proposals/reference-target-explainer.md#-phase-2-shadowroot-referencetargetmap-attribute. That examples in that proposal imply an IDL like this: ``` interface ShadowRoot : DocumentFragment { // ... attribute DOMString? referenceTarget; attribute ReferenceTargetMap referenceTargetMap; // added in Phase 2. } // Added in Phase 2: interface ReferenceTargetMap { DOMString? ariaControls; DOMString? ariaActiveDescendant; DOMString? htmlFor; // etc... } ``` So the behavior would be that `shadowRoot.referenceTarget` is the default, and is overridden by any non-null values in the `ReferenceTargetMap`. I can see an argument for grouping everything together into a single `ReferenceTarget` interface, but I do think it'd be nice to keep the simple case simple and allow a direct `shadowRoot.referenceTarget = "target"` rather than requiring the additional indirection `shadowRoot.referenceTarget.default = "target"`. Either design seems basically reasonable though. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1353#discussion_r2076547720 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1353/review/2819988873@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 6 May 2025 23:42:20 UTC