- From: Frederik Wessberg <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 22:56:18 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2025 05:56:22 UTC
wessberg left a comment (whatwg/dom#533) @jamesdiacono We've been down that path before with [MutationEvents](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/MutationEvent) which caused many issues and was later unshipped from browsers. Instead I think we _may_ be able to achieve consensus that adding a `connected` (or similar wording) to `MutationObserver is the way forward? Based on recent discussion in this thread it seems like the approach most favored. And I'm also leaning towards agreeing that its better than my original idea of a dedicated observer. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/533#issuecomment-2844160108 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/533/2844160108@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 1 May 2025 05:56:22 UTC