- From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:46:23 -0700
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2025 00:46:27 UTC
martinthomson left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1001) Thanks for raising that here Jake. I can see how this is potentially problematic. Is your point that this is a straight-up misfeature and it shouldn't exist at all because match-element is enough for SPA where as MPA can't rely on auto unless there is exceptional id-allocation discipline? Or, do you have an alternative approach in mind? Is that alternative as simple as an appropriately-scoped `[id] { view-transition-name: attr(id type(<custom-ident>)) }`? (We are given repeated reminders how the TAG and standards groups more generally have no direct ability to affect what ships in browsers, so I doubt we can do anything about Safari plans.) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1001#issuecomment-2752874076 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1001/2752874076@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2025 00:46:27 UTC