- From: Shiba <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 10:22:43 -0700
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Sunday, 23 March 2025 17:22:47 UTC
DeepDoge left a comment (whatwg/dom#736) I really don't wanna create conflict but I really don't like the idea of: > does not affect childNodes or children as it's meant to be transparent (differently from SD) Transparent from query selectors? Yes! - _I mean naturally, since it's not an `Element` type._ Transparent from in `childNodes`? No, because it's a `ChildNode` in the DOM. Filtered from `children`? Yes, because it's not an `Element` type. Transparent in `children`, meaning `children` of fragment appear as if they are fragment's parent's `children`? No! I don't think this needs to be over complicated, a basic container `ParentNode & ChildNode` with normal DOM hierarchy, and just transparent to query selectors, since it's not an `Element`. I don't think hacking with DOM hierarchy is good for JS. --- Maybe it's already like this? and I miss understood what you meant there? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/736#issuecomment-2746322160 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/736/2746322160@github.com>
Received on Sunday, 23 March 2025 17:22:47 UTC