- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 09:17:33 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 21 March 2025 16:17:36 UTC
inexorabletash left a comment (w3c/IndexedDB#443) Agreed, the text and code in that example appear incorrect. Note that the normative spec text in the [inject a key into a value](https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/WD-IndexedDB-3-20250228/#inject-key-into-value) algorithms explicitly handle Array, so it's just that example that's wrong. I suspect the example dates back to early prototypes of IndexedDB where values were serialized with JSON rather than structured cloning; additional properties on arrays aren't supported in JSON, but the structured cloning algorithm supports them. So: just need a fix for the example. PRs welcome! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/443#issuecomment-2743844527 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/443/2743844527@github.com>
Received on Friday, 21 March 2025 16:17:36 UTC