- From: Andrew Liu <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 09:29:19 -0700
- To: whatwg/storage <storage@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2025 16:29:24 UTC
MrPickles left a comment (whatwg/storage#179) > @MrPickles to discuss the use of storage sheds from https://privacycg.github.io/nav-tracking-mitigations/#clear-non-cookie-storage-for-host. Looking at that, it's possible the call site should actually move into Storage as a higher-level operation. The current use case of storage sheds within the BTM spec is to delete all storage for a given host. Intuitively, abstracting that behavior into the storage spec seems reasonable to me. However, there may be future spec changes around conditionally partitioning storage for a site. It's currently in an [explainer](https://github.com/privacycg/nav-tracking-mitigations/blob/main/explainers/bounce-tracking-mitigations-for-dual-use-sites.md#partition-storage) and nothing is finalized yet, but I can imagine the possibility of direct manipulation of storage sheds in such a scenario. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/179#issuecomment-2741037461 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/storage/pull/179/c2741037461@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2025 16:29:24 UTC