Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Final Review Request of seven (7) W3C VCWG Specifications (Issue #1029)

msporny left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1029)

> [@msporny](https://github.com/msporny), what's the relationship of this issue to [#899](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/899) ? 

#899 predates the request to review *Securing Verifiable Credentials using JOSE and COSE* in this issue. IOW, #899 is a duplicate of this issue and the [satisfaction](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1029#issuecomment-2735699135) of this review, IMHO, closes #899 as well. I see you came to the [same conclusion](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/899#issuecomment-2735712608) in #899, so I think we're good here (no further action from TAG necessary).

> (hehe, yes, do my job for me)

I'll take it out of your positive karma balance... your remaining balance is around a trillion karma points. :)


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1029#issuecomment-2736569092
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1029/2736569092@github.com>