Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Specification review for fenced frames (Issue #838)

shivanigithub left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#838)


> Hi [@blu25](https://github.com/blu25) - Our core issue with the current specification is that the use cases it's supporting can also be "abuse" cases (as we put it above)... Can you provide some additional use cases that make it clearer why this technology is needed? 

The [use cases explainer 1-pager](https://github.com/WICG/fenced-frame/blob/master/explainer/use_cases.md) is the most complete document for concrete use cases we’ve heard till now. 


> Can you also provide some suggested mitigations against the potential for abuse that we highlighted above?

Since this is regarding the local unpartitioned data access functionality, I responded to its specific TAG review here https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/975#issuecomment-2733452352

Thanks!


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/838#issuecomment-2733594203
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/838/2733594203@github.com>