Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Editorial: Fix broken links/fragments (PR #1760)

@monica-ch commented on this pull request.



> @@ -161,9 +161,9 @@ spec: storage; urlPrefix: https://storage.spec.whatwg.org/
 
   Web developers familiar with previous attempts to solve the offline problem have reported a deficit of flexibility in those solutions. As a result, the [=/service worker=] is highly procedural, providing a maximum of flexibility at the price of additional complexity for developers. Part of this complexity arises from the need to keep [=/service workers=] responsive in the face of a single-threaded execution model. As a result, APIs exposed by [=/service workers=] are almost entirely asynchronous, a pattern familiar in other JavaScript contexts but accentuated here by the need to avoid blocking document and resource loading.
 
-  Developers using the <a href="https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/API/Window/applicationCache">HTML5 Application Cache</a> have also <a href="http://alistapart.com/article/application-cache-is-a-douchebag">reported that several attributes</a> of the design contribute to <a href="http://alistapart.com/article/application-cache-is-a-douchebag#section6">unrecoverable errors</a>. A key design principle of the [=/service worker=] is that errors should *always* be recoverable. Many details of the update process of [=/service workers=] are designed to avoid these hazards.
+  Developers using the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cache_manifest_in_HTML5">HTML5 Application Cache</a> have also <a href="https://alistapart.com/article/application-cache-is-a-douchebag/">reported that several attributes</a> of the design contribute to <a href="https://alistapart.com/article/application-cache-is-a-douchebag/">unrecoverable errors</a>. A key design principle of the [=/service worker=] is that errors should *always* be recoverable. Many details of the update process of [=/service workers=] are designed to avoid these hazards.

@yoshisatoyanagisawa I didn't find better url for the app cache. Let me know if that is okay otherwise can remove url

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1760#pullrequestreview-2693040791
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1760/review/2693040791@github.com>