Re: [whatwg/dom] Add definition for composed selection range (PR #1342) from Dominic Farolino on 2025-03-14 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from March 2025)

From: Dominic Farolino <notifications@github.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:59:23 -0700
To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1342/c2725396705@github.com>

domfarolino left a comment (whatwg/dom#1342)

> Yeah, I mean with this we collapse if one of the nodes is disconnected which is something the PR didn't do before.

OK, got it. So just to be clear, the behavior of NOT collapsing the composed selection range in the first case I mention is fine with you? I ask only because it looks like Firefox DOES collapse the composed selection range in that case, which I think would fail the incoming WPT being written.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1342#issuecomment-2725396705
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1342/c2725396705@github.com>

Received on Friday, 14 March 2025 17:59:27 UTC