Re: [whatwg/dom] Naming of Composed Range (Issue #1363)

domfarolino left a comment (whatwg/dom#1363)

Either of the first two are my preference, and I would prefer to not go with the last two. My rationale is that we don't need to call out "same-tree" explicitly, or include "tree" alongside "composed"; that's what the presence/absence of "composed" does alone. For example, [`composedPath()`](https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-event-composedpath) isn't called `composedTreePath()`, and [`root`](https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-tree-root) isn't called `same-tree root` (maybe it should be though 👀).

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/1363#issuecomment-2708444082
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/1363/2708444082@github.com>