- From: Steven Becker <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 15:00:51 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2025 22:00:55 UTC
@SteveBeckerMSFT commented on this pull request. > @@ -1371,6 +1371,38 @@ To <dfn>convert a value to a key range</dfn> with </div> + +A <dfn>potentially valid key range</dfn> is a value that is a [=key/type|type of key=] or a [=key range=]. Yes, you're right in pointing out that this abuses the definition of key type. I've updated the definition in a new attempt. Perhaps we need to update the definition of key to better support the getAll()/getAllKeys() dictionary overload, but I'd like to avoid this larger change if possible. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/461#discussion_r2170105628 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/pull/461/review/2963821929@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2025 22:00:55 UTC