Re: [w3c/permissions] Aspects and integration with Permissions Policy (Issue #459)

jyasskin left a comment (w3c/permissions#459)

I designed the aspects to handle permissions like 'camera', 'usb', and 'display-capture', where you don't just have the permission or not. Instead you have permission to use a particular camera, device, or screen/window/tab. Permission policy hasn't needed to capture the particular device that's being delegated, so it could ignore those aspects.

+1 that it was probably a mistake to try to use them for boolean things like sysex and allowWithoutGesture. However, to flatten them, you'll need to figure out what you want to do with the ["stronger than"](https://w3c.github.io/permissions/#dfn-stronger-than) relation: do you want a permission policy of "midi-with-sysex" to allow requesting midi-without-sysex? (Probably, but you'll need to include it in your specification change.)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/459#issuecomment-2981144027
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/permissions/issues/459/2981144027@github.com>