Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Private Proof API (Issue #1071)

toreini left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1071)

> Yes, indeed that is possible with the current design in the explainer. One mitigation we could apply is binding the proof to a nonce provided by the issuer at challenge time, the underlying cryptography supports this. Still, I should clarify, if you have a sink of valid tokens, then you can generate proofs and rate limiting tokens anyways, as we cannot bind the tokens to a device without seemingly violating some of our aims to allow cross-platform compatibility.
> 
> Currently, this API is on hold, but if we pursue it I will be sure to address the concerns you raised about replay attacks and the inaccurate diagram. 



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1071#issuecomment-3136965292
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1071/3136965292@github.com>