- From: Luke Warlow <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 05:47:19 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 July 2025 12:47:23 UTC
@lukewarlow commented on this pull request.
> + double total = 0;
+};
+</pre>
+
+<p><a>Events</a> using the {{ProgressEvent}} interface indicate some kind of progression.
+
+<p>The
+<dfn attribute for=ProgressEvent><code>lengthComputable</code></dfn>,
+<dfn attribute for=ProgressEvent><code>loaded</code></dfn>, and
+<dfn attribute for=ProgressEvent><code>total</code></dfn>
+getter steps are to return the value they were initialized to.
+
+
+<h3 id=firing-events-using-the-progressevent-interface>Firing events using the {{ProgressEvent}} interface</h3>
+
+<p>To <dfn id=concept-event-fire-progress>fire a progress event</dfn> named <var>e</var> at
Should fetch really fire sync events? It would match XHR but I wonder if these should be queued instead?
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/pull/1843#pullrequestreview-3055272706
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/pull/1843/review/3055272706@github.com>
Received on Friday, 25 July 2025 12:47:23 UTC