Re: [whatwg/webidl] Allow a separate getter/setter attribute pair (Issue #1506)

domenic left a comment (whatwg/webidl#1506)

I've wanted better getter/setter syntax for some time. https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/issues/485 has some previous discussion. This issue points to some concrete benefits that might bring.

Since that issue, [class accessor syntax](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decorators?tab=readme-ov-file#class-auto-accessors) has been proposed for JS. (And even reached stage 3, although it's stuck since no implementers seem to be interested in implementing...)

My proposed syntax would be something like

```webidl
get DOMString innerHTML;
[CEReactions] set (TrustedHTML or [LegacyNullToEmptyString] DOMString) innerHTML;

accessor DOMString textContent;
```

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/webidl/issues/1506#issuecomment-3093188408
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/webidl/issues/1506/3093188408@github.com>