- From: James M Snell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 07:12:10 -0700
- To: whatwg/fetch <fetch@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Friday, 18 July 2025 14:12:14 UTC
jasnell left a comment (whatwg/fetch#1838) @annevk: > This would result in information leakage as discussed upthread. I could see something like this working in non-browser environments though. Understood. As long as it's not forbidden by the spec in anyway, then we can live with that. > ... As mentioned upthread supporting 429 and 5xx seem like reasonable (opt-in) extension points. Yep. If that's the case, as mentioned, I *really* think we shouldn't have the `retryNonIdempotent` option. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1838#issuecomment-3089609036 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/fetch/issues/1838/3089609036@github.com>
Received on Friday, 18 July 2025 14:12:14 UTC