- From: Mattias Buelens <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 04:16:33 -0700
- To: whatwg/streams <streams@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2025 11:16:37 UTC
MattiasBuelens left a comment (whatwg/streams#1345) Indeed. We currently only use an [async iterable *declaration*](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-async-iterable-declaration), we don't (yet) use an [async iterable *type*](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-async-iterable-type). So the current standard doesn't need any changes, only #1310 does. Side note: shouldn't [the heading of 2.13.29](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-async-iterable-type) say "Async iterable types — async_iterable\<T>" (with an underscore) now? There are still quite a few occurrences of "async iterable\<T>" (with a space) in the WebIDL spec text. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/streams/issues/1345#issuecomment-3057008024 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/streams/issues/1345/3057008024@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 10 July 2025 11:16:37 UTC