- From: Noam Rosenthal <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 02:40:51 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1040@github.com>
こんにちは TAG-さん! I'm requesting a TAG review of "deferred commit" behavior for navigation API. This is a small extension of the [navigation API](https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api), which was previously reviewed in https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/605 and https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/717. Explainer¹ (minimally containing user needs and example code): https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api/blob/main/README.md#deferred-commit User research: Actively discussed on our issue tracker: https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api/issues/277, also requested by major frameworks. Security and Privacy self-review²: None - this shouldn't expose anything that isn't already available GitHub repo (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api/ Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): Nate Chapin (@natechapin), Google Noam Rosenthal (@noamr), Google Domenic Denicola (@domenic), Google Organization/project driving the design: Google External status/issue trackers for this feature (publicly visible, e.g. Chrome Status): https://chromestatus.com/feature/5134734612496384. Further details: We recognize that this might be too small for TAG to review, but we'd let TAG be the judge of that. I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/) The group where the incubation/design work on this is being done (or is intended to be done in the future): WICG The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done ("unknown" if not known): WHATWG Existing major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this design: https://github.com/WICG/navigation-api/issues/225 Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this design: None yet. The main point of debate has been the name. I am happy to consider alternatives to sourceElement. This work is being funded by: Google We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as (please delete all but the desired option): 💬 leave review feedback as a comment in this issue and @-notify [@natechapin, @domenic, @noamr] -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1040 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1040@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2025 10:40:55 UTC