- From: Lea Verou <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2025 14:48:46 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Saturday, 11 January 2025 22:48:49 UTC
This seems like a very straightforward low-hanging-fruit improvement to me. Nit: Why `gap-rule` and not just `rule` which would be consistent with the `row-gap`/`column-gap`/`gap` shorthand? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1035#issuecomment-2585469879 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1035/2585469879@github.com>
Received on Saturday, 11 January 2025 22:48:49 UTC