- From: Evan Stade <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2025 12:34:01 -0800
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/437@github.com>
The spec says: > The abort() method steps are: > > If [this](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#this)'s [state](https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#transaction-state) is [committing](https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#transaction-committing) or [finished](https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#transaction-finished), then [throw](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#dfn-throw) an "[InvalidStateError](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#invalidstateerror)" [DOMException](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-DOMException). However, the spec also says > A transaction can be aborted at any time before it is [finished](https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#transaction-finished), even if the transaction isn’t currently [active](https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#transaction-active) or hasn’t yet [started](https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#transaction-start). Both of these texts were added at the same time, [here](https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/commit/671f315528f210e4c9ccd62e6420c502dad0693c). FWIW it appears that Chromium still allows a `committing` (but not `finished`) transaction to be aborted via `abort()`. ========== tangentially, regarding spec language, sometimes I see wording like > If [this](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#this)'s [done flag](https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#request-done-flag) is false, then [throw](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#dfn-throw) an "[InvalidStateError](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#invalidstateerror)" [DOMException](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#idl-DOMException). > > Otherwise, return [this](https://webidl.spec.whatwg.org/#this)'s [result](https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#request-result), or undefined if the request resulted in an error. And other times I see wording that omits the "otherwise". Is it correct to assume that "throw" implies that the next steps won't happen, and therefore the "otherwise" is unnecessary? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/437 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/437@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 9 January 2025 20:34:05 UTC