- From: vmpstr <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 12:09:12 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1061@github.com>
vmpstr created an issue (w3ctag/design-reviews#1061) こんにちは TAG-さん! I'm requesting a TAG review of CSS View Transition - Nested View Transition Groups. [View transitions](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-view-transitions-1/) work by generating a pseudo-element tree representing groups of the captured old state & the live new state of a transition. In its current form, the generated tree is "flat" - the original hierarchy in the DOM is lost, and all the captured groups are siblings under a single ::view-transition pseudo-element. Instead of a flat tree, the author can nest ::view-transition-group pseudo-elements within each other. This is done with a new property, [view-transition-group](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-view-transitions-2/#view-transition-group-prop), which when applied on an element with a view-transition-name, defines whether the generated ::view-transition-group gets nested in one of its containers, or it would nest its own participating descendants. - Explainer¹: https://github.com/WICG/view-transitions/blob/main/nested-explainer.md - Specification: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-view-transitions-2/#view-transition-group-prop - WPT Tests: https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-view-transitions/nested?label=master&label=experimental&aligned - User research: N/A - Security and Privacy self-review²: N/A - GitHub repo: https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/ - Primary contacts: - @vmpstr (Google, Author) - @noamr (Google, Author) - Organization/project driving the specification: Google - Multi-stakeholder support³: - Chromium comments: N/A - Mozilla comments: (pending) - WebKit comments: (pending) - Status/issue trackers for implementations⁴: https://chromestatus.com/feature/5162799714795520 Further details: - [x] I have reviewed the TAG's [Web Platform Design Principles](https://www.w3.org/TR/design-principles/) - Previous early design review, if any: N/A - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: N/A - The group where the work on this specification is currently being done: CSSWG - The group where standardization of this work is intended to be done (if different from the current group): - Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification: N/A - This work is being funded by: Google -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1061 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1061@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 26 February 2025 20:09:16 UTC