- From: Dominic Farolino <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:55:51 -0800
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2025 18:55:55 UTC
@domfarolino commented on this pull request. > @@ -8141,12 +8149,21 @@ interface Range : AbstractRange { }; </pre> -<p>Objects implementing the {{Range}} interface are known as -<dfn export id=concept-live-range>live ranges</dfn>. +<p>A <dfn export id=concept-live-range>live range</dfn> is a <a>range</a> that is affected by +mutations to the <a>node tree</a>.</p> + +<p>Objects implementing the {{Range}} interface are <a>live ranges</a>. I think @dizhang168's latest comment is a good direction to go. It's basically option (2) in https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1342#discussion_r1932710902 and satisfies @annevk's concerns about changing the definition of "live range". I vote we go that way. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1342#discussion_r1970359384 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1342/review/2642124821@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 25 February 2025 18:55:55 UTC