- From: Mcdeamon241 <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 11:40:59 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1059@github.com>
Mcdeamon241 created an issue (w3ctag/design-reviews#1059) こんにちは TAG-さん! I'm requesting the TAG express an opinion on a dispute related to: - Name: [feature or document name] - Specification URL: [spec url] - Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: [url] - User research: [url to public summary/results of research] - GitHub issues: [url] - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): [github usernames] - The group where the work on this specification is: - Links to major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: - Links to major unresolved issues or opposition with this specification: - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: [please provide] We recommend the explainer to be in Markdown. Explanation of the issue that we'd like the TAG's opinion on: Links to the positions of each side in the dispute (e.g., specific github comments): What steps have already been taken to come to an agreement: -------------none------------- _Please preview the issue and check that the links work before submitting._ In particular, if anything links to a URL which requires authentication (e.g. Google document), please make sure anyone with the link can access the document. opm/govt-1, general personnel records. ¹ For background, see our [explanation of how to write a good explainer](https://tag.w3.org/explainers/). Duplicate of # -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1059 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1059@github.com>
Received on Sunday, 23 February 2025 19:41:04 UTC