[w3ctag/design-reviews] Fig (Issue #1059)

Mcdeamon241 created an issue (w3ctag/design-reviews#1059)

こんにちは TAG-さん!

I'm requesting the TAG express an opinion on a dispute related to:

  - Name: [feature or document name]
  - Specification URL: [spec url]
  - Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: [url]
  - User research: [url to public summary/results of research]
  - GitHub issues: [url]
  - Primary contacts (and their relationship to the specification): [github usernames]
  - The group where the work on this specification is:
  - Links to major pieces of multi-stakeholder review or discussion of this specification: 
  - Links to major unresolved issues or opposition with this specification:
  - Relevant time constraints or deadlines: [please provide]

We recommend the explainer to be in Markdown.

Explanation of the issue that we'd like the TAG's opinion on:

Links to the positions of each side in the dispute (e.g., specific github comments):

What steps have already been taken to come to an agreement:

-------------none-------------

_Please preview the issue and check that the links work before submitting._ In particular, if anything links to a URL which requires authentication (e.g. Google document), please make sure anyone with the link can access the document.
opm/govt-1, general personnel records.
¹ For background, see our [explanation of how to write a good explainer](https://tag.w3.org/explainers/).
Duplicate of #

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1059
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1059@github.com>