Re: [w3c/editing] CfC: Publish the "ContentEditable" draft spec as a FPWD, and then immediately republish as a Discontinued Draft (Issue #480)

siusin left a comment (w3c/editing#480)

Thank you, folks!

The current WebEditing WG charter states that the EditContext API is one of the Normative Specifications and includes the following provision:

> Depending on the working group progress, including interest from multiple implementers, the Group may also produce W3C Recommendations ... (for ) Primer or Best Practice documents to support web developers when designing applications.

This means it is acceptable to publish REC-track documents, including FPWDs and Discontinued Drafts for "ContentEditable", as a primer or a supporting document for EditContext. Florian has further explained why an FPWD + Discontinued Draft approach is preferable in terms of patent commitments.



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/editing/issues/480#issuecomment-2668662723
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/editing/issues/480/2668662723@github.com>