Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Editorial: Queue a task to resolve/reject promise or when fire an event. (PR #1755)

yoshisatoyanagisawa left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1755)

I started to wonder whether we need [=in parallel=] if almost all sub steps under [=in parallel=] is enqueued.
Considering how I code the algorithm, I would write `base::Callback()` of the sub steps to be queued, which might match the behavior that simply enqueue the sub steps to the parallel queue.
What do you think?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1755#issuecomment-2661777692
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1755/c2661777692@github.com>