- From: Andrea Giammarchi <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 07:35:23 -0800
- To: WICG/webcomponents <webcomponents@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2025 15:35:27 UTC
WebReflection left a comment (WICG/webcomponents#551) I love @perrelet suggestion and I'd rise my excitement proposing `<the-end />` or `<b-r />` or `<parsed-elemnent />` as I think that's the right tool (?), ahem, workaround to this issue ... back to standards bodies maintainers, do you need that module to be popular enough to re-think this discussion? It would mean a community effort to find the best name for it and call it a day from Web developers/users side of affairs ... but to the one replying "*yeah, but nodes can be appended after*" I believe the entirety of the Web would answer *who cares, their problem* so we have a chance to fix 99% of users expectations and tell that other 1% things are just as broken as things used to be before `<parsed-element />` happened in specs! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/WICG/webcomponents/issues/551#issuecomment-2656978988 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <WICG/webcomponents/issues/551/2656978988@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2025 15:35:27 UTC