- From: Xiaocheng Hu <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 23:10:29 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2025 07:10:33 UTC
@ffiori Thanks for the prompt reply! I see this hit-testing API has been compared with an event API, and major reason the CSSWG moved away from it due to its much higher complexity. Is that correct, and did I miss any other points? Btw it will be great if the event API is listed in the [Alternative Solutions](https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdgeExplainers/blob/main/highlight/HighlightsFromPointsExplainer.md#alternative-solutions) section of the explainer with a comparison. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1043#issuecomment-2655711063 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1043/2655711063@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 13 February 2025 07:10:33 UTC