Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] allow service workers to created nested dedicated workers (#1529)

What about letting SW connect to an already running SharedWorker's port if it's trivial to implement? It'll be kinda weird though that `new SharedWorker()` may fail when the worker isn't running, so maybe a new API should be added e.g. to find the running worker via `self.clients` or a new one like `self.clientWorkers`...

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1529#issuecomment-2643953018
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1529/2643953018@github.com>

Received on Friday, 7 February 2025 19:50:28 UTC