Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Local Peer-to-Peer API (Issue #932)

@martinthomson & TAG team, thank you for revisiting this review request. The split of the Open Screen Protocol dependency has in fact already [happened](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-secondscreen/2024Dec/0001.html), and the new WDs have been published (and the [all-in-one spec](https://www.w3.org/TR/openscreenprotocol/) appropriately archived):
- [Open Screen Application Protocol](https://www.w3.org/TR/openscreen-application/)
- [Open Screen Network Protocol](https://www.w3.org/TR/openscreen-network/)

The group believes the Network Protocol part could possibly move to IETF Dispatch.

This split was in part motivated by feedback from the TAG and discussion with IETF experts.

Your suggestion to put this TAG review on hold for the time being as we gather feedback from the relevant IETF groups sounds good. Thank you for your directional guidance and pushing related efforts onwards at IETF too.

That said, feel free to share any related IETF developments in this issue, e.g. if the discussion re HTTPS on the settle list develops into new deliverables or changes relevant to this work.


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/932#issuecomment-2639901332
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/932/2639901332@github.com>