Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] WG New Spec: RDF 1.2 N-Triples (Issue #1161)

csarven left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1161)

Thanks for following up.

The specific concatenation scenario about when multiple version declarations are included was about the grammar rather than contamination, noting (with fresh eyes) that https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf12-n-triples/#sec-grammar-grammar indeed permits multiple directives in a given document. The referenced issues will help clarify. I mentioned one additional case to consider at https://github.com/w3c/rdf-turtle/issues/118#issuecomment-3674111046 - when a triple does not precede with a version directive.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1161#issuecomment-3674129100
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1161/3674129100@github.com>