- From: Sam Goto <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 09:13:13 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2025 17:13:17 UTC
samuelgoto left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1169) > we think that this discussion is best taken to the IETF, as I think we all agreed Much appreciated for the early review, and @dickhardt and I both appreciate the early guidance from the TAG with incomplete information. We acknowledge that this isn't a trivial trade-off, and are grateful that this review uncovered/pushed on some of the big open questions (e.g. the three party model vs the two party model), their trade-offs (e.g. developer ergonomics vs privacy) and some second order / unintended consequences (e.g. its relationship to passkeys) that we should dig through. We'll follow your guidance and take the protocol/backend to the IETF (and the html/frontend somewhere in the W3C and/or possibly to the WHATWG), which we'll report back on this thread as it goes along. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1169#issuecomment-3671277795 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1169/3671277795@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2025 17:13:17 UTC