- From: Martin Thomson <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2025 01:50:39 -0800
- To: w3ctag/design-reviews <design-reviews@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2025 09:50:43 UTC
martinthomson left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1169) @samuelgoto @dickhardt, After discussion with the TAG, we think that this discussion is best taken to the IETF, as I think we all agreed. The TAG has consensus on that point. I think that we generally like the use case. There are a number of points here on which both of you and I, personally, might disagree. We don't have consensus in the TAG on any of that, but we do have consensus that a lot of those issues are best resolved with more discussion at the IETF. So, we encourage you to continue to polish the proposal and take it to the IETF (where I'm sure you'll hear from me at some point as well). I've marked this as both validated and ambivalent at different levels. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1169#issuecomment-3669406079 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1169/3669406079@github.com>
Received on Thursday, 18 December 2025 09:50:43 UTC