- From: Yoshisato Yanagisawa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2025 19:21:10 -0800
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 1 December 2025 03:21:14 UTC
yoshisatoyanagisawa left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1803) Thank you for your thoughts, @asutherland. I agree that this is a broader issue for the Fetch specification. It's worth noting that the potential for a service worker to replay a navigation response is not a new risk introduced by features like `ServiceWorkerAutoPreload`. This possibility has existed since `NavigationPreload` was introduced. This seems to reinforce the ideas discussed in whatwg/fetch#1323, such as adding a new header to indicate to the server that a service worker is involved. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1803#issuecomment-3594359407 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1803/3594359407@github.com>
Received on Monday, 1 December 2025 03:21:14 UTC