- From: Steven Becker <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 12:34:54 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 18 August 2025 19:34:58 UTC
SteveBeckerMSFT left a comment (w3c/IndexedDB#473) Good find! For the potential solution, what is the transaction's associated request? Since transaction's have a [request list](https://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/#transaction-request-list), we'd probably need to set the error for each request in the list? At this point, maybe we've proven that your original idea to return the upgrade transaction and then check its error might be cleanest and best? Sorry for the churn. Thanks for iterating! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/473#issuecomment-3198154697 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/473/3198154697@github.com>
Received on Monday, 18 August 2025 19:34:58 UTC