- From: Yoshisato Yanagisawa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2025 03:18:17 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2025 10:18:21 UTC
yoshisatoyanagisawa left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1784) Thank you for the clarification. I realize I misunderstood your last comment. My understanding now is that we should avoid adding a new, key-based lookup to the Storage Standard, and instead use an existing environment whenever possible. With that in mind, I've created a PR at https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1786 that takes this approach, using the request's reserved client as the environment. Does this align with what you were suggesting? If so, I would appreciate a review. (By the way, I will be off for several days and may not be responsive for a while.) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1784#issuecomment-3159170293 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1784/3159170293@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 6 August 2025 10:18:21 UTC