- From: Yoshisato Yanagisawa <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:21:11 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2025 07:21:14 UTC
yoshisatoyanagisawa left a comment (w3c/ServiceWorker#1784) You are right, my previous example about the install event was imprecise. An environment is indeed available there. However, this discussion has clarified my thinking, and I've become convinced that the most robust design is to tie CacheStorage lookup directly to the persistent storage key, rather than having it depend on a transient environment. This avoids a conceptual mismatch and better reflects the persistent nature of the cache. My PR (https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/185) is an attempt to implement this cleaner architecture by introducing a direct lookup via the storage key. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1784#issuecomment-3153810499 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1784/3153810499@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2025 07:21:14 UTC