- From: Steven Becker <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 13:18:28 -0700
- To: w3c/IndexedDB <IndexedDB@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Monday, 4 August 2025 20:18:32 UTC
SteveBeckerMSFT left a comment (w3c/IndexedDB#461) I completed this pull request because I thought we had enough consensus to add getAllRecords() to the working draft. However, feedback welcome! Please [create a GitHub issue](https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/new) for any feedback on this PR and I'll investigate. As other implementations emerge, we can continue to iterate on the design where needed by [creating more GitHub issues](https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/new). Thank you everyone for the reviews, feedback and participation thus far. Lastly, stelar7, who reviewed this change, is not from Microsoft. He prototyped [getAllRecords() in the Ladybird browser](https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/pull/5385). He has also been providing valuable feedback on the IndexedDB spec while working on its implementation in Ladybird. Thank you stelar7! -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/pull/461#issuecomment-3152220905 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/pull/461/c3152220905@github.com>
Received on Monday, 4 August 2025 20:18:32 UTC