- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 02:32:08 -0700
- To: whatwg/encoding <encoding@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2025 09:32:12 UTC
annevk left a comment (whatwg/encoding#344) Upon further consideration I think supporting `[AllowResizable]` for all of these is reasonable. The weirdest thing that could happen is that `encodeInto()` returns numbers that are no longer accurate because the buffer grew, but that would only happen in some kind of race with the `encodeInto()` call, at which point that's to be expected. And yes, the specification will continue to define this as doing a copy that could potentially be elided with a lot of careful work. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/344#issuecomment-2841375132 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <whatwg/encoding/issues/344/2841375132@github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 30 April 2025 09:32:12 UTC