Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Custom Functions (@function) (Issue #1031)

xiaochengh left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#1031)

Hi @andruud, the TAG discussed the feature and are satisfied with it.

We would also like to see the explainer improved, as it seems to mostly serve early exploration purposes and are mixed with the mixins feature. The TAG prefers a dedicated explainer that's put next to the relevant spec, which is not only for TAG reviews, but also serves as an official explainer for everyone who reads the spec.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1031#issuecomment-2830285922
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/1031/2830285922@github.com>