Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Document-Isolation-Policy (Issue #995)

martinthomson left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#995)

A small bit of feedback if I may.  That response was very good.  So good, that I think you should delete the entire explainer and replace it.  The explainer is very long and convoluted, but this is both clear and concise.  I understand that there are some important details in the explainer that you haven't repeated, so you'd need a *bit* more, but I'd risk losing detail if it provided the clarity you achieved here.

With that understanding (which I'm sure I had an approximation of six months ago, but lost), I think that my concerns might now be reduced to questions about spelling.  For instance, why invent new labels for things when `require-corp` and `credentialless` are labels in COEP that apply directly in this design?  That's relatively minor.  (Anne's comments are still relevant, of course.)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/995#issuecomment-2829035398
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/995/2829035398@github.com>