Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Wait loop questions (Issue #436)

inexorabletash left a comment (w3c/IndexedDB#436)

> Is step 10.6 and 10.7 only supposed to run if we are not put into the finished state by the event?

Yep. 

We should add a step after step 10.5 that's basically "If transaction's state is active, then run these steps:" and make the subsequent steps substeps of this. I believe that will handle calling either _abort()_ or _commit()_ during the dispatch, similar to https://w3c.github.io/IndexedDB/#fire-a-success-event


-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/IndexedDB/issues/436#issuecomment-2791252153
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/IndexedDB/issues/436/2791252153@github.com>