Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Editorial: Revise reference links with bikeshed (PR #1762)

@yoshisatoyanagisawa commented on this pull request.



> @@ -88,6 +88,12 @@ spec: ecma-262; urlPrefix: https://tc39.es/ecma262/
             text: statement
             text: declaration
 
+spec: html; urlPrefix: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/

Thanks for the reply and sorry for the delay, let me dump what I understood:
1. use the W3C spec exported dfns (i.e. autolinking database) as much as possible.  It allows bikeshed to find out the broken links when it happens.
2. if it is not possible (e.g. not W3C spec or so), the "anchors" block or the explicit indication can be used as a fallback, but makes maintainability bad because of bikeshed does not find the broken link.

Let me discuss the next actions in the #1763.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1762#discussion_r2026188578
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/pull/1762/review/2738502397@github.com>