Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Partitioning :visited links history (Issue #896)

martinthomson left a comment (w3ctag/design-reviews#896)

We're excited that this is moving forward and that the specification has moved into https://drafts.csswg.org/selectors-4/#visited-privacy.

We encourage the CSSWG to refer to the same partitioning concepts we are using for other site-level state, instead of redefining the partition key in the Selectors spec. The three-level key does match what we understand to be used elsewhere, but you should cite either https://storage.spec.whatwg.org/#storage-keys or https://privacycg.github.io/storage-partitioning/.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/896#issuecomment-2770802656
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/896/2770802656@github.com>