Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: asynchronous event listeners (Issue #1308)

Please, keep things civil.

---

I have created a document to expand on the ideas in this thread: https://github.com/mmocny/proposal-async-event-listeners, to prepare for the discussion happening later today in a TPAC breakout session: https://www.w3.org/events/meetings/df616a60-8591-4f24-b305-aa0870aac1cb/

---

Some of the concerns with `preventDefault()` do not apply to the original proposal in this thread.  Hopefully we can create a separate forum for further discussion for the related problems that this proposal touched on.

To keep things focused, please, let's constrain this thread to the specific problem: "Lack of support for passive Event Listeners." and the specific suggestion to leverage [Prioritized Task Scheduling API](https://wicg.github.io/scheduling-apis/) options.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/1308#issuecomment-2375262194
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/issues/1308/2375262194@github.com>