Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Need to explain name matching rules for cache names (#1483)

This issue is still open and the issue still exists in the CRD (checked just now):

https://www.w3.org/TR/2022/CRD-service-workers-20220712/#cache-storage-has

After my plane landed in 2019 ( 😄 ) Infra did add the definition [is](https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/#string-is) along with a synonym "identical to". Either of these can be linked.



-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1483#issuecomment-2374295729
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1483/2374295729@github.com>

Received on Wednesday, 25 September 2024 14:42:04 UTC