Re: [whatwg/encoding] Support GB18030-2022 (PR #335)

@annevk commented on this pull request.



> +  <p>If <a for="gb18030 encoder">is GBK</a> is false and there is a row in the table below whose
+  first column is <var>code point</var>, then return the two bytes on the same row listed in the
+  second column:

WebKit (and presumably Chromium) having updated the table (as evidenced by https://github.com/vitorroriz/WebKit/commit/b7d4f07a3aac04e70f1d91d09be57e4dd2ded612) means GBK is impacted at the moment as well. In particular for the symmetrical mappings at the top of https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/issues/312#issuecomment-2354764499. What do we want to do for GBK? Perhaps it's okay if that gets slightly less PUA as well? @hsivonen what do you think?

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/encoding/pull/335#discussion_r1764396847
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/encoding/pull/335/review/2311621826@github.com>