- From: Jeffrey Yasskin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 12:45:43 -0700
- To: w3c/permissions <permissions@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2024 19:45:47 UTC
@reillyeon reports in https://github.com/WICG/idle-detection/pull/55#discussion_r1752504934 that browsers retrieve the permission state asynchronously, so use of permission state in specs needs to be 'in parallel'. But https://w3c.github.io/permissions/#dfn-permission-state doesn't have any indication of this fact, so it's easy to write specifications that incorrectly promise to return results an event-loop-turn early. Ideally this indication would integrate with [Strudy](https://github.com/w3c/strudy/)'s parallel algorithm checking. cc/ @tidoust -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/permissions/issues/453 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <w3c/permissions/issues/453@github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 10 September 2024 19:45:47 UTC