Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Go for gold (5316d7f)

I don't think we need to single it out.

Moreover, the way that gdocs were listed implied that we thought they were OK, as long as they were publicly accessible.  That's not really true.  The ease with which content can be changed in a Google Doc makes them less suitable for this sort of thing.

(Yes, I'm aware that there is a history mechanism, but it's generally not available to anyone other than those with edit access.  Whereas a public git repository tends to be pretty traceable.)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/commit/5316d7f915d5e7f92e82e069f6b697af6fe15ee5#r146324612
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <w3ctag/design-reviews/commit/5316d7f915d5e7f92e82e069f6b697af6fe15ee5/146324612>