Re: [whatwg/dom] Introduce `moveBefore()` state-preserving atomic move API (PR #1307) from Anne van Kesteren on 2024-09-04 (public-webapps-github@w3.org from September 2024)

From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 00:26:01 -0700
To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Message-ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1307/c2328112536@github.com>

Creating two separate mutation records that a consumer would have to merge to (fully) understand it's a move seems suboptimal?

I agree that it should probably work for disconnected nodes as well, but I don't think we want to support a case where the shadow-including root changes.

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/dom/pull/1307#issuecomment-2328112536
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <whatwg/dom/pull/1307/c2328112536@github.com>

Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2024 07:26:04 UTC